BETA In open beta. Install live. Lock $5/mo for your first 12 months. See pricing →
Cost calculator

What does Hydrate save your team?

Based on 12 benchmark runs using real Anthropic API spend. APJ Ltd run, April 2026. All figures are indicative - actual savings depend on your usage pattern and model mix.

Three-step arbitrage workflow. Step 1: a gear labelled Brain (Sonnet / Opus) at $5 per million input tokens does the high-quality thinking. Step 2: a filing cabinet labelled Snapshot extracts the essential context once and stores it locally, free and repeatable. Step 3: a factory labelled Worker (Haiku / Local LLM) at $1 per million input tokens executes many tasks using the snapshot. Fast, cheap, scalable.
Plan once in the smart model, snapshot the result, execute cheaply forever. That is the arbitrage the BYOK tab below quantifies.
Anthropic's Opus 4.5+ price drop (Nov 2025) cut Opus input from $15/M to $5/M and output from $75/M to $25/M, a 3× reduction. That makes "plan in Opus, execute in Sonnet" (the Hydrate arbitrage pattern) economical for solo developers, not just enterprises. The Opus-plan / Sonnet-execute toggle in the BYOK tab models it.
Configuration
Deployment configuration
Subscription plan
100
4
20
15%
Assumptions
Results
Seat cost / mo
-
-
Hydrate cost / mo
-
-
Cache hit rate
-
-
Sessions rescued / mo
-
-
Cache saving / mo
-
vs cold-start baseline
Annual saving
-
-
ROI multiple
-
saving ÷ Hydrate cost
Saving / value Hydrate cost Seat cost

Cost-per-session figures from real APJ Ltd benchmarks: baseline $0.158/session, Sonnet+Hydrate $0.206/session, Haiku+Hydrate $0.160/session, Firefighter (Haiku+Hydrate) $0.075/session. Cache hit rates measured: baseline 67%, Sonnet+Hydrate 96.1%, Haiku+Hydrate 96.8-97%. All figures are indicative - actual savings depend on your usage pattern, model mix, and session characteristics.

APJ Ltd benchmarks - April 2026 · real Anthropic API spend
Dev sprint
Haiku + Hydrate (multi-session)
Cost / session$0.160
Cache hit96.8%
Quality7 / 10
Sessions shipped6 / 6
Recommended

Lead architect uses Sonnet once to pin decisions. Developers use Haiku with Hydrate injecting context. Saves ~55% vs baseline at enterprise scale.

Multi-sprint
3 sprints · Haiku + Hydrate
Cost (3 sprints)$1.93
Cache hit97.4%
Quality8 / 10
vs Sonnet ($2.54)−$0.61
Cost + Quality win

Haiku+Hydrate beats Sonnet on both cost AND quality across 3 sprints. $1.93 vs $2.54 - 24% cheaper with a higher quality score (8/10 vs 7/10).

Onboarding
New hire first session
Haiku+Hydrate cost$0.162
Sonnet cost$0.510
Cache hit (Hydrate)98%
Quality deltaEqual (7/10)
3.15× cheaper

Equal quality at 3.15× lower cost. Hydrate injects existing project facts - Haiku no longer needs to infer what it can be told directly.

Extrapolated annual cost - 1,000 developers · ~880 sessions/year each
Configuration Annual cost Annual saving vs baseline Cache benefit Quality
Baseline - Sonnet, no Hydrate ~$220,000 - 67% cold start 8/10
Quality - Sonnet + Hydrate ~$160,000 ~$60K saved (27%) 96.1% throughout ≥8/10
Savings * - Haiku + Hydrate ~$100,000 ~$120K saved (55%) 96.8% throughout 7/10
Firefighter - Haiku + Hydrate ~$66,000 ~$154K saved (70%) 97% throughout Equal to Sonnet
Developer onboarding - equal quality, 3.15× cheaper
The story isn't "Hydrate prevents onboarding mistakes." It's "Hydrate makes Haiku viable for onboarding, so you don't need to pay Sonnet prices for a new hire's first session." Equal quality. 3.15× cheaper. No caveats.
v10 - Eve + Hydrate (Haiku)
Implementation cost$0.162
Cache hit rate98%
Quality7 / 10
Session contextHydrate injected existing project facts
ResultTask completed, conventions followed
v11 - Eve, no Hydrate (Sonnet)
Implementation cost$0.510
Cache hit rate96%
Quality7 / 10
Session contextCold start - no prior project knowledge
ResultTask completed, conventions inferred
Annual onboarding savings by company size
Company size New hires / year Onboarding sessions each Baseline cost (Sonnet) With Hydrate (Haiku) Annual saving
Small - 20 devs~550$127.50$40.50$87
Medium - 100 devs~2550$637.50$202.50$435
Large - 500 devs~12550$3,187.50$1,012.50$2,175
Enterprise - 2,000 devs~50050$12,750$4,050$8,700
Note: For subscription-plan buyers (Max, Team Premium), the onboarding saving manifests as limit extension rather than direct API cost reduction - Haiku+Hydrate uses included allocation more efficiently, meaning onboarding tasks don't push teams into overage billing.

The broader implication

A new developer on Sonnet needs Sonnet's reasoning power because they don't know the codebase. They're asking Claude to infer what was decided, understand undocumented conventions, and avoid contradicting choices made weeks ago. Hydrate gives Haiku that knowledge explicitly - injected as structured facts before the session starts. The model no longer needs to infer what it can be told directly. That's why quality matches at 3.15× lower cost. Context poverty is the tax you pay when memory is absent.

Pay-per-token (BYOK)

Model direct API spend on your own Anthropic key. Three mixes covering the common BYOK shapes. All rates pull from src/data/anthropic-rates.json. Change the rates there to refresh every number on this page.

Devs
1
Single-dev mode is the common BYOK case.
Sessions / dev / day
4
Working days / month
20
Avg tokens per session
150K
Model mix
Monthly baseline (no Hydrate)
$0
Monthly with Hydrate cache
$0
Saving / month
$0
0%

Assumes 30% output token ratio; Hydrate cache resolves 96.8% of input tokens at the cache-read rate, 3.2% at the fresh input rate (compact-survival/v1.0 measured ratio).